Skip to main content

[Un]reliable Science —
Webinar, Workshops & Professional Training

Research-based, practice-oriented formats for journalists, educators and institutions navigating science communication under structural pressure.

WORK WITH US

Scientific information shapes democratic debate, public health decisions, climate policy and institutional trust.

Yet in a platform-driven information environment, flawed, exaggerated or prematurely published research can shape headlines long before corrections reach the public. Retractions often travel slower than the original claim. Generative AI systems reproduce outdated findings. Algorithms amplify engagement rather than accuracy.

This is not simply a matter of individual reporting mistakes. It is a structural challenge. Accelerated news cycles, press-release-driven reporting, economic pressure in newsrooms and platform logics create conditions in which unreliable scientific claims can circulate widely — and persist.

unreliable science header

The [Un]reliable Science Workshops translate empirical research into concrete professional safeguards.

Building on findings from the research project “Unreliable Science: Unravelling the Impact of Mainstream Media Misrepresentation”, we provide structured tools for source evaluation, correction workflows and responsible reporting under uncertainty.

Our formats — from focused webinars to intensive workshops — are designed for newsroom realities. Interactive, case-based and adaptable to your institutional needs, they move beyond awareness toward practical, sustainable solutions.

Free Un:reliable Science Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)

Want to explore these challenges in greater depth? The Un:reliable Science Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on the DigiCampus platform offers a deeper look at how unreliable scientific claims travel through today’s platform-driven information environment.

The free English-language course examines the structural pressures shaping science communication and provides practical insights for journalists, educators and institutions working with scientific information.

Start the course

[Un]reliable Science Workshops

Workshops translating research challenges into practical communication strategies.

Unreliable Science: Unravelling the Impact of Mainstream Media Misrepresentation
Duration:
90 minutes webinar
Format:
Online · Interactive · Case-based
unreliable science header

This interactive webinar introduces key findings from the Unreliable Science project and provides participants with a structured overview of how unreliable scientific claims enter and circulate in mainstream and digital media environments.

View Workshop Details:

Participants will explore:

  • How unreliable scientific information is produced within academic systems
  • How press releases and wire services shape media uptake
  • Why retracted studies continue to circulate
  • Whether AI systems recognise retractions
  • What this means for editorial responsibility

The session draws on empirical analyses of high-profile retracted studies (Altmetric-based tracing) and experimental research on AI awareness of retractions.

Participants gain:

  • A systemic understanding of the information pathway
  • Awareness of structural vulnerabilities
  • Concrete examples of how unreliable science circulates
  • Verification checkpoints
WORK WITH US
Unreliable Science: Addressing Unreliable Science in Journalism and Education
Duration:
4-hour Professional Workshop
Format:
Online or Onsite · Case-based · Practical exercises
unreliable science header

This workshop is to strengthen participants’ practical capacity to detect, evaluate, and responsibly report on scientific claims under real-world editorial constraints, combining systemic understanding with applied verification tools.

View Workshop Details:

Participants will explore:

  • The full pathway of scientific information from publication to platform amplification
  • Risk signals in scientific publications (preprints, retractions, predatory journals)
  • Advanced source evaluation and expert verification
  • Editorial decision-making under uncertainty
  • Responsible reporting on retractions and corrections
  • Challenges posed by AI-generated or AI-amplified content

Participants will:

  • Apply structured evaluation criteria to scientific sources
  • Identify red flags in studies and press materials
  • Develop strategies for handling retractions and updates
  • Improve correction practices and follow-up reporting
  • Strengthen editorial safeguards in their own institutional context
WORK WITH US
Unreliable Science in Practice
Duration:
2 days intensive training
Format:
Onsite · Interactive · Customizable
unreliable science header

This training is to provide in-depth, institution-level engagement with the structural, ethical, and practical challenges of unreliable science in media environments, enabling teams and institutions to develop sustainable safeguards and verification frameworks.

View Workshop Details:

Participants will explore:

  • Structural transformations in the information ecosystem and their impact on journalism
  • Vulnerabilities within scholarly publishing and research incentive systems
  • Retractions, corrections, and continuity challenges in newsrooms
  • Advanced evaluation of data, statistics, and visualisations
  • Ethical and legal dimensions of science reporting
  • xpert sourcing, authority misuse, and avoiding false balance

Participants will:

  • Develop institutional-level verification checklists and correction protocols
  • Strengthen internal decision-making frameworks
  • Improve responsible reporting on uncertainty and evolving evidence
  • Enhance trust-building strategies with audiences
  • Leave with concrete tools adaptable to newsroom or educational settings
WORK WITH US
UnSci

Policy Brief: Governing the Afterlife of Retracted Science

This policy brief examines why retracted scientific articles continue to shape media coverage, public debate, policy processes, and AI-mediated information systems long after their formal withdrawal. Drawing on recent empirical evidence, it identifies a structural gap between scientific self-correction and public knowledge circulation. The document outlines concrete policy recommendations for EU AI governance, science journalism, and digital platform regulation to prevent the continued amplification of invalidated research and to safeguard evidence-informed decision-making

Download now

Strengthen your editorial safeguards.

People in Meeting Room

Book a webinar or workshop and equip your team to report science responsibly — even when speed and uncertainty define the environment.

Get in touch with us to tailor the format to your newsroom, university or training programme:

Write an emailCall +43 680 5523742
Close Menu